Why Cosmopolitan Should Refrain From Giving Any Sort of "Advice"

Cosmopolitan is certainly a magazine with great history, and an icon of American pop culture. Known best for it's freedom to cover female sexual topics, it has set the standard for young women's magazines.
What I find most curious and disappointing about women's magazines is that your choice is one of two selections. You either purchase a racy sexually packed magazine like Cosmo, or you purchase the next extreme of being a home maker in magazines like Good Housekeeping. There is no middle ground. You are either seeking advice of how to remove semen from your hair from the night before and still get him to call you, or you are going to knit a sweater out of your dog's hair while there is a pie in the oven.
Men's magazines are equally biased, however, men's magazines never, ever, promote bowing down and sacrificing self worth for the opposite sex as many female magazine's do. Playboy and GQ would never dare run an article suggesting that a man shut his trap and give in to his girlfriend's every whim. So why is it okay to do this to women?
What disturbs me the most about Cosmopolitan is how it teaches women that in order for a man to even be in a relationship with you, you must follow certain guidelines. You are to give him sex at any given time, even if you have just met him, because there is potential here for a relationship and it will all turn out just fine! Next, after sex you're supposed to serve him (get him water, rub his back) look as beautiful as possible, and then in order to keep his interest, don't call him so he won't think you're clingy even though you just did the most intimate thing possible between two people.
Now, I find many things wrong with all of this, but let me explain why. Is it good and essential to treat your man well? Yes. Should you do all you can to make him happy? Absolutely. In no way am I promoting that women should do nothing and let the man do everything. Here is my point, rubbing his feet and wearing something sexy is all fine and dandy under certain circumstances that I believe many women are lacking.
First off, I do not believe that women should be so giving of their bodies or themselves to a man whom they are not in a relationship with. This is a bare minimum essential. You would not bend over backwards for a stranger, and the man you met at the bar? That's a stranger. Some guy you've met a few times with friends? Still a stranger. Part of the courting process does not entail sex of any kind, or baking, or back rubs. Nothing. This part is for getting to know one another, to see if you're compatible or not, learning each other's hobbies. That is of course, if you are seeking a relationship.
Baking and back rubs comes after the relationship is established. After two people have learned each other's boundaries, about who each is as a person, and choosing to learn more about one another and grow together, seeing where it leads you. To show affection after a good base is established is absolutely necessary from both ends in order for the relationship to blossom and reach it's full potential.
To be so giving towards a man who hasn't even established that he wants a relationship is foolish. It is the same as being super giving to anyone you just met, male or female. It creates the standard that you are easily won without any real knowledge of anything, that few walls are built up around yourself, and that you have low self worth. Everything with people, romantic relationships or not, should be earned.
Has someone shown you that they are with your time, energy, affection? Do you feel this is someone you can open up to? So many many elements go into a successful relationship, and tousled hair and the right shoes have very little to do with it. The bottom line is, sex and affection needs to be earned, not just thrown out for free.
I admit to being guilty of purchasing Cosmopolitan's December issue. Normally it comes with a horoscope booklet for the new year (Yes horoscopes! I know I'm terrible, truly.) But this year, I was jipped of the booklet. Perhaps I was confused and it comes in next month's issue?
Reading through the magazine has led me to believe that Cosmopolitan should refrain from giving any kind of "advice". Its more of a what not to do guide than anything else.
The first article is on singer, Fergie, the cover girl. Discussed in the article is her house, how she looks, how her body changes and if her husband likes it or not, and other senseless information about the woman. No mention is made of her singing career, awards and accomplishments, nothing. Oh, scratch that, there is mention of how she got off drugs. Okay... well! I would think that an established singer would get better recognition in an article over her talents and what she is famous for instead of such superficial nonsense.
Next are "Confessions" embarrassing stories that both men and women have supposedly written into the magazine about, and nasty things they have done to other people. Virtually every story has to do with sex. Apparently the American public is not embarrassed or proud of doing anything that is not crude such as people thinking they've wet their pants or someone discovering condoms and dildos in your luggage.
In one story a woman discusses how her false breast enhancer popped out while dancing with a man in a nightclub. A man writes in offering advice on how to help the situation, and suggests that the girl have "balls" and purchase the gentleman a beer. Now there's a story you can proudly share over the dinner table! Another story is how a woman had her clip in hair extensions yanked out by her boyfriend while they were making out.
The most embarrassing thing that has ever happened to me was when I was awarded a certificate from the Senator of my state and I thanked him by calling him the wrong name. I will never allow myself to live it down. No beer or breasts necessary in that story. Although, come to think of it, perhaps I should have bought him one and had balls!
Other articles include, "Hidden Secrets His Hug Reveals". Umm, what? You are going to uncover some sort of secret in the way a man hugs you? Another article talks about how to turn a one night stand into something more. Next, my favorite article, "Make His Number One Sex Wish Come True".
Advice includes but is not limited to writing him a note that discusses your last sexual encounter, and leaving it an unexpected place such as his wallet or freezer, squeezing his butt at a random moment, and locking him in his car for sex. I suppose such things may produce sexual gratification on his behalf, but he may also question your sanity.
I truly hope that the female population will learn that there is no quick way to lock down a man into a relationship. It doesn't matter how beautiful you are or not, if you're wearing the right shoes, if you toss you hair a certain way in bed. It doesn't matter if you call him or not, rub his feet or cook him eggs. The bottom line is that two people, man and woman, need to take the time to get to know one another. Show one another who they are, discover if they like one another, grow together. It's all about who you are upstairs, in your brain, and the kind of person you are, although looking good never hurt anyone. No amount of makeup or sexual acrobats can make up for that.